Timing of the Guzumi (2022)
Overview
Referenced by ( 2022MainLine) : The hanezeki's tail has reached its minimum length of two stones, caused by the two shared liberties of the large hanezeki groups and in the corner. This is also the moment when KataGo starts to seriously consider my Guzumi for Black again. In the early days of our intensive analyses of the problem, the optimal moment for playing my Guzumi was for a long time an unresolved question. With our inadequate resources, we made an estimate of this at the time, ... ... which culminated in the perception that the "best" moment would probably be immediately before the start of the Crosscut-Sequence in the left centre. Below we present KataGo's "opinion" on this complex of issues in detail. | |
: : : : | |
///: We will start the story of KataGo's evaluations with Black's moves in the upper right corner. In the next chapter of our website you will find a comparable analysis of the position without previous Hasami-Tsuke Sequence. ( 1863) : This is the second moment when KataGo seriously considers playing my Guzumi. KataGo's assessment is not that reliable here. The subvariation for at is part of the next chapter ( 1864). Below you will find a corresponding illustration for the case after Harry's Hasami-Tsuke Sequence. | |
: ; : A Black move at the Guzumi Point was not considered. | |
:( G 1814) KataGo assigned my Guzumi a win rate of about 40% (in Analysis Mode; with komi = -1). If a Black move at was manually enforced, KataGo's self-play games thereafter (with komi = -1) ended in a draw (adjusted White + 2), even with a very large number of playouts. In these self-play games, KataGo mistakenly blocked the path of the hanezeki's tail with a move at immediately. | |
: ( G 1816) KataGo assigned my Guzumi a win rate of about 20% (in Analysis Mode; with komi = -1), apparently having realised that this move was a mistake. If a Black move at was manually enforced, KataGo blocked the path of the hanezeki's tail with a move at immediately. This made me aware of the change in the order of moves , , (most likely played much later), for the position two moves earlier, resulting in the correction of KataGo's line of play. | |
: Choosing my Guzumi at this point of the game leads to the variation of Our Solution (2021); please refer to ( 0009.htm#ü2021) for details. | |
: ( G 1817) KataGo assigned my Guzumi a win rate of about 25% (in Analysis Mode; with komi = -1), apparently having realised that this move was a mistake. However, if a Black move at was manually enforced, KataGo needed a rather large number of playouts to successfully punish Black for his mistake in its self-play games thereafter. | |
: : : | |
Referenced by ( 2031) : | |
: (G 1819) KataGo assigned my Guzumi a win rate of about 45% (in Analysis Mode; with komi = -1). However, as you will see in the subvariation, choosing my Guzumi would complicate the game unnecessarily. | |
: (G 1821) KataGo assigned my Guzumi a win rate of about 30% (in Analysis Mode; with komi = -1). However, as you will see in the subvariation, choosing my Guzumi would complicate the game unnecessarily. | |
: (A 1822) Please note that - with Harry's Hasami-Tsuke Sequence , already played - starting the creation of the nakade with a move at - as Fujisawa Hideyuki did in his classical solution - would be a grave mistake. | |
Referenced by ( 2022MainLine), ( 2032) :( G 1823) As you will see below, continuing the Nakade Sequence with is a grave mistake, so this is the very last moment for playing my Guzumi. | |
: : : : (96 1824) Alternatively, White might immediately capture in the lower left with , not affecting the outcome of the game. | |
Referenced by ( 1869) : :
: : : : | |
: ; : | |
: | |
Referenced by ( 2031) ... | |
Black must not play any reduction. | |
Capture Variation: Compared to Our Solution (2021), ...
In total, Black lost one point. White + 2 => White + 3 | |
Semeai Variation: Compared to Our Solution (2021), ...
In total, Black lost four points. Black + 4 => Jigo | |